Our district needs more elementary and middle school seats,
and a dedicated District 3 high school.
These goals can be better achieved through the creation of new schools
instead of rebuilding existing schools. Rebuilding schools would have negative impacts, including moving students to temporary schools, closing
playgrounds, increasing the density of our neighborhood, increasing demand for
student seats, and potentially losing an architecturally significant building
(PS 199.) We have previously outlined how
this advertised Offering Memorandum / RFEI proposes a school that is at best
marginally bigger than the existing school (we estimate 12 additional students
for PS 199), with much of the space underground.
We have posted a time clock on the right column of this
site. This shows the amount of time that
has passed since the DOE announced their proposal to demolish and re-develop
three possible schools in the city on October 29, 2012. Today is the 200th day.
Below is the original announcement as it appeared in
Crain's. Notice that it is not presented
as a first, preliminary step. It is
presented as, "The Offering Memorandum." Further, on the back page of the supporting document (RFEI) it states, "CBRE is pleased to invite you to
participate in the bidding for this premier investment opportunity." To us, that does not read like a first
step. It reads like a request for
serious offers for the property(s).
We see no downside in asking the DOE to engage with the
community now. Why wait? What's the downside of standing up and
speaking now?
No comments:
Post a Comment